TL;DR
Get school and study supplies delivered free — and shop member deals
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Access to Prime Big Deal Days deals on October 6–7
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
Starting October 1, 2026, arXiv limits each submitter to two submissions per calendar month across all subject categories, with no more than three active submissions at once. The repository says the temporary policy responds to record submission volume and pressure on volunteer moderators; rejected papers still count toward the monthly cap.
arXiv began limiting submitters to two papers per calendar month on October 1, while retaining a maximum of three active submissions at a time. The repository says the update is a stopgap response to record submission volumes and the workload on its volunteer moderators, and applies across all subject categories.
The new monthly limit counts all submissions, whether accepted or rejected. arXiv says the restriction is based on submissions because each one requires moderator time. Authors who use their two submissions in a given month must wait until the next month to submit again, even if one or both papers do not proceed to announcement.
The separate three-active-submission limit, in place since 2024, remains. A submission still on hold from an earlier month does not use a new month’s two-submission allowance, but it does count toward the three active submissions. The monthly cap applies across categories; submitting in different subject areas does not create separate allowances.
The limits apply to the person who submits a paper, not every co-author. If one author uploads a paper on behalf of a group, arXiv says it counts toward that submitter’s limit, not the other authors’ limits. The repository advises people with a backlog or conference deadline to plan submissions around both restrictions.
The change places a new scheduling constraint on researchers who regularly submit several papers, including those working across multiple arXiv categories. Because rejected papers also count, authors have less room to make successive submissions in a month after a paper is declined or held. That may affect how teams time submissions tied to conferences or other deadlines.
For arXiv, the policy is intended to distribute moderation capacity more evenly and protect review time for submissions that meet its standards. The repository says a relatively small share of authors is responsible for many low-quality submissions, taking a disproportionate amount of volunteer moderators’ time. It says this can delay other papers by days or weeks, though it did not quantify the share of submissions or the delays.
The limit also marks a practical response to the scale of incoming work while arXiv considers longer-term practices for authors using increasingly capable AI tools. It does not ban AI-assisted research. ArXiv’s stated policy allows AI as a research aid when its use is disclosed and the work meets the repository’s standards for scholarly interest and contribution.
academic paper submission organizer
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Record Submission Growth
ArXiv reported 40,363 submissions in September 2026, a record for a single month, and said those submissions generated almost 9,000 support tickets for staff and moderators. The comparison figures in its announcement were 9,869 submissions in September 2016 and 20,569 in September 2024. ArXiv described the total as having doubled over the two years from September 2024 to September 2026.
The repository also reported that submissions to its cs.AI category increased more than sixfold over the past two years, while other categories saw submissions double over that period. These figures describe submission counts; arXiv did not attribute every increase to AI tools. It said advanced AI can speed up parts of research and writing, while moderators are seeing more narrow-scope papers, work split into multiple smaller submissions, and dense papers written with AI assistance.
ArXiv has used rate limits before, with restrictions historically left largely to moderator discretion. The organization says its longstanding submission rules require work to be original, novel, significant, self-contained, relevant to an arXiv category, and of scholarly interest. The October policy formalizes a broad numeric limit while the repository reviews how its moderation tools and procedures should adapt.
“As of October 1st, 2026, arXiv is instituting an updated rate limiting policy across all submitters and categories as a stopgap.”
— arXiv
researcher document management folder
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Policy Effects Still Unknown
ArXiv has not said how long the stopgap policy will remain in place or what criteria it will use to decide whether to change it. The announcement does not estimate how many submitters will reach the monthly limit, how the cap may affect submission timing across disciplines, or whether it will reduce delays for other authors.
The repository’s description of low-value and AI-written submissions reflects what moderators are observing; the announcement does not provide a detailed count or independent measurement of those papers. It also does not claim that AI accounts for all submission growth. Further information would be needed to judge the policy’s effect on both moderation workload and access for authors with legitimate high-volume or deadline-driven work.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
The two-per-month cap is in effect from October 1, 2026, and authors must account for it alongside the three-active-submission maximum. Those with conference deadlines or a backlog are being asked by arXiv to plan submissions carefully; papers submitted by a co-author count against that submitter’s allowance only.
ArXiv says the interim limits give it time to improve moderation tools and procedures and to consider practices for research produced with more advanced AI assistance. The announcement does not give a timetable for further changes, so authors should treat the stated limits as the current policy unless arXiv publishes an update.
professional research paper binder
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Key Questions
How many papers can one person submit to arXiv each month?
From October 1, 2026, a submitter may make up to two submissions per calendar month, across all arXiv categories.
Do rejected papers count toward the monthly limit?
Yes. ArXiv says the limit counts submissions, not only announced papers, so rejected submissions use part of the monthly allowance.
Does the three-active-submission limit still apply?
Yes. The existing maximum of three active submissions remains. Papers on hold from a prior month count toward that active-submission total, but not against the new month’s allowance.
No. ArXiv says rate limits apply to the person who submits the paper. A submission made by one co-author counts against that person’s limit, not the other authors’ limits.
Is arXiv banning papers that use AI?
No. ArXiv says authors may use AI as a research tool if its use is disclosed and the submission meets the repository’s scholarly standards. The new policy limits submission frequency rather than prohibiting AI-assisted work.
Source: hn
Fall Picks
fall essentials
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
