For most Airbnb hosts, I’d start with the Schlage Encode Smart WiFi Deadbolt: its built-in Wi-Fi and keypad support remote code management without requiring a separate hub. The eufy Security Smart Lock C220 stands out for fingerprint access, while the myQ Secure View 3-in-1 combines entry control with a video doorbell for hosts who want a view of the doorway. The main tradeoffs are remote access and guest-code management versus hardware fit, battery upkeep, and the added complexity of cameras or smart-home features. A keypad can simplify check-in, but hosts still need a backup plan for dead batteries, network outages, and guests who struggle with setup. Read on for how these 15 options differ and which type of rental each suits.
Prime made for students and young adults
- Fast, free delivery for dorm and study essentials
- Prime Video and Amazon Music included
- Member-only deals
Key Takeaways
Built-in Wi-Fi matters for remote hosting: The Schlage Encode models and several Wi-Fi-equipped Philips, myQ, Wyze, and eufy options can reduce dependence on a separate hub, but hosts should verify the exact app features and connectivity requirements before choosing.
Deadbolts are the clearest fit for many rental doors: The lineup includes deadbolts, handle sets, and knob locks; a knob-style model may be easier to install but is not a direct substitute for a secure deadbolt.
Fingerprint access is not a replacement for guest codes: Models such as the eufy C220, Wyze Lock Bolt v2, and Philips fingerprint deadbolt can suit owner access, while keypad codes are often simpler to issue to changing guests.
Video adds a separate privacy and power decision: The myQ Secure View models combine a lock with a 2K HDR video doorbell camera, but hosts should weigh charging or battery logistics and guest privacy against the convenience of a door view.
Small product variations can affect the right pick: The two Schlage Encode trims and the two myQ configurations serve similar broad purposes, but trim style and battery configuration may influence fit and upkeep; confirm the exact package before ordering.
| Philips WiFi Smart Lock with Handle Set |  | Best Overall for Straightforward Remote Hosting | Connectivity: WiFi; no gateway required | Unlock methods: Fingerprint, passcode, app, and voice control | Fingerprint unlock speed: 0.3 seconds | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| myQ Secure View 3-in-1 Smart Lock with 2K HDR Video Doorbell Camera |  | Best for Hosts Who Want Doorstep Video | Product type: Smart deadbolt, video doorbell, and security camera | Video resolution: 2K HDR | Entry methods: Face recognition, fingerprint, PIN, app, and key | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Veise VE027-L WiFi Smart Lock with Handles Set for Front Door, Satin Nickel |  | Best for Exterior-Door Durability | Connectivity: Direct 2.4 GHz WiFi; no hub required | Battery type: Eight AA batteries, not included | Auto-lock timer: Adjustable from 0–180 seconds via app | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Fingerprint Smart Deadbolt with Keypad |  | Best for High-Turnover Guest Codes | Unlock methods: Fingerprint, keypad code, app, fob, and physical key | Fingerprint capacity: More than 100 | Code capacity: More than 100 | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| myQ Secure View 3-in-1 Smart Lock with Extra Battery |  | Best for Hosts Who Want a Backup Battery Included | Product type: Smart deadbolt, video doorbell, and security camera | Camera resolution: 2K HDR | Entry methods: Face recognition, fingerprint, PIN, app control, and key | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Veise VE017-L Fingerprint Smart Lock with 2 Lever Handle Set, Matte Black |  | Best for Fast, Keyless Guest Check-In | Model: VE017-L | Finish: Matte black | Material: Zinc alloy | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Aqara UWB Smart Lock U400 with Apple Home Key and Fingerprint Deadbolt |  | Best Premium Pick for Apple-Centric Rentals | Model: U400 | Finish: Black | Access methods: UWB, Apple Home Key, fingerprint, touchscreen passcode, voice, app, NFC, and physical key | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Philips Smart Deadbolt Lock Set with Keypad and Two Lever Handles |  | Best for Hosts Who Need Many Guest Codes | Included hardware: Deadbolt lock and two lever handles | Access methods: Fingerprint, PIN, key, app, and Bluetooth | Fingerprint capacity: Up to 50 fingerprints | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt Lock with Fingerprint and Keyless Entry |  | Best for Remote Airbnb Management | Access methods: App, passcode, fingerprint, physical key, Alexa, and Google Assistant | Connectivity: Built-in 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi; no hub required | Maximum passcodes: 100 custom passcodes | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Ulecoce U68W WiFi Fingerprint Smart Door Lock with Knob Set, Matte Black |  | Best for Flexible Auto-Lock and Remote E-Key Sharing | Model: Ming-U68W-Black | Finish: Matte black | Material: Zinc alloy | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Wyze Lock Bolt v2 Fingerprint Smart Lock with Wi-Fi |  | Best for Fast Fingerprint Check-Ins | Model: WLCKB2 | Unlock methods: Fingerprint, app, keypad code, physical key | Connectivity: Built-in Wi-Fi | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Schlage Encode Smart WiFi Deadbolt Lock with Camelot Trim, Matte Black |  | Best for High Guest Turnover | Connectivity: Wi-Fi, direct to home network | Voice control: Amazon Alexa and Google Assistant | Access-code capacity: Up to 100 codes | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Smart Door Handle Lock with Keypad, Yamiry Fingerprint Knob for Front Door |  | Best for Flexible Entry Methods | Model: YR01 | Unlock methods: Fingerprint, Bluetooth app, keypad passcode, key fob, mechanical key, Alexa voice | Remote and Alexa requirement: Separate Wi-Fi gateway | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| eufy Security Smart Lock C220 – Fingerprint Keyless Entry Door Lock |  | Best for All-Around Keyless Access | Model: T8506 | Unlock methods: Fingerprint, app, keypad, physical key, Apple Watch, voice assistant | Connectivity: Built-in Wi-Fi | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Schlage Encode Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt with Century Trim, Matte Black |  | Best for Remote Monitoring and Alerts | Connectivity: Built-in Wi-Fi | Access-code capacity: Up to 100 codes | Voice assistants: Amazon Alexa and Google Home | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| smart lock for airbnb host | Connectivity | Battery life |
|---|---|---|
| Philips WiFi Smart Lock with H | WiFi; no gateway required | — |
| myQ Secure View 3-in-1 Smart L | — | 4–6 months |
| Veise VE027-L WiFi Smart Lock | Direct 2.4 GHz WiFi; no hub required | — |
| Fingerprint Smart Deadbolt wit | — | — |
| myQ Secure View 3-in-1 Smart L | — | — |
| Veise VE017-L Fingerprint Smar | — | Up to 12 months |
| Aqara UWB Smart Lock U400 with | Matter over Thread | Up to six months |
| Philips Smart Deadbolt Lock Se | — | — |
| Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt L | Built-in 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi; no hub required | — |
| Ulecoce U68W WiFi Fingerprint | Wi-Fi | Over six months |
| Wyze Lock Bolt v2 Fingerprint | Built-in Wi-Fi | Up to 8 months |
| Schlage Encode Smart WiFi Dead | Wi-Fi, direct to home network | Up to 6 months typical use |
| Smart Door Handle Lock with Ke | — | — |
| eufy Security Smart Lock C220 | Built-in Wi-Fi | Approximately 8 months |
| Schlage Encode Wi-Fi Smart Dea | Built-in Wi-Fi | Up to 6 months with typical use |
More Details on Our Top Picks
Philips WiFi Smart Lock with Handle Set
I’d rank this Philips as the most balanced choice for hosts who want remote access without adding a hub. Its direct WiFi connection lets me manage entry and view access history in the app, while fingerprint, passcode, and voice access give guests more than one way in. Compared with the myQ Secure View 3-in-1, it skips the camera and doorbell features, but that keeps the setup focused on access rather than video monitoring and subscription-dependent extras. The included handle set can also simplify replacing a matching door setup. The tradeoff is its narrower fit: it’s specified for wooden doors only, and careful alignment matters to avoid jamming. I’d choose it for ordinary wooden Airbnb entry doors, not for a door whose material or fit is uncertain.
Pros:- Connects to WiFi directly, with no gateway required for remote app control.
- Supports fingerprint, passcode, app, and Alexa or Google Assistant voice control.
- Provides activity history and real-time alerts to help hosts track access.
- Includes a handle set and is designed for screwdriver-based DIY installation.
Cons:- Compatibility is limited to wooden doors 1⅜–2 inches thick.
- Careful door alignment and installation are needed to reduce the risk of jamming.
- Does not include video monitoring like the myQ Secure View models.
Best for: Airbnb hosts with compatible wooden doors who want direct remote access, guest codes, and access records without a separate gateway.
Not ideal for: Hosts with metal or other non-wood doors, or doors that are difficult to align with the included handle set.
- Connectivity:WiFi; no gateway required
- Unlock methods:Fingerprint, passcode, app, and voice control
- Fingerprint unlock speed:0.3 seconds
- Voice assistants:Amazon Alexa and Google Assistant
- Access features:Remote control, activity records, real-time alerts, auto-lock, and one-touch locking
- Included hardware:Handle set
- Door compatibility:Wooden doors 1⅜–2 inches thick
- Installation:DIY; screwdriver required
Our verdict“I’d pick this Philips for a compatible wooden Airbnb door when reliable remote entry matters more than an integrated camera.”
myQ Secure View 3-in-1 Smart Lock with 2K HDR Video Doorbell Camera
For a host who wants to see who is at the door as well as control entry, this myQ combines a smart deadbolt, doorbell, and 2K HDR camera in one device. Two-way audio and color night vision can help me communicate with arriving guests or check a late arrival without relying on a separate camera. It also offers five entry methods, including face recognition, fingerprint, PIN, app, and key, with capacity for up to 16 PINs. Compared with the Philips WiFi Smart Lock with Handle Set, this is the stronger pick for remote visual checks, but it brings more features to manage and some detection and security tools require a subscription. Battery life is listed at 4–6 months, and a spare battery and myQ Chime are sold separately. Face Access is unavailable in Illinois and Texas.
Pros:- Combines a smart deadbolt, video doorbell, and security camera.
- 2K HDR video, color night vision, and two-way audio support remote doorstep checks.
- Offers face, fingerprint, PIN, app, and key entry, with capacity for up to 16 PINs.
- Includes auto-lock and is designed for DIY installation on most standard doors.
Cons:- Some detection and security features require a subscription.
- Spare battery and myQ Chime are sold separately.
- Face Access is unavailable in Illinois and Texas.
Best for: Hosts who want a single entry device with video, two-way audio, and several guest entry options, and who are comfortable using the myQ app.
Not ideal for: Hosts who want remote lock management without subscription-dependent features, or who need Face Access in Illinois or Texas.
- Product type:Smart deadbolt, video doorbell, and security camera
- Video resolution:2K HDR
- Entry methods:Face recognition, fingerprint, PIN, app, and key
- PIN capacity:Up to 16 PINs
- Battery life:4–6 months
- Video and communication:Color night vision and two-way audio
- Other features:Motion alerts and auto-lock
- Installation:DIY installation for most standard doors
Our verdict“I’d choose this myQ when doorstep video and guest communication are worth accepting app and subscription dependencies.”
Veise VE027-L WiFi Smart Lock with Handles Set for Front Door, Satin Nickel
The Veise VE027-L is the pick I’d favor when an Airbnb entry door faces weather and the host wants remote control without a hub. Its IP65 water resistance gives it a more clearly stated exterior-ready profile than the Philips WiFi Smart Lock with Handle Set, which is specified for wooden doors but has no water-resistance rating in the supplied details. Veise also pairs direct 2.4 GHz WiFi with fingerprint, app, voice, keypad, and key entry, so guests have alternatives if fingerprint access doesn’t suit them. The adjustable auto-lock timer can help reduce the chance of a door being left unsecured. The compromises are practical: it takes eight AA batteries that aren’t included, and setup may be less approachable than the Philips option. I’d check the handle-to-lock spacing before ordering.
Pros:- Connects directly to 2.4 GHz WiFi without a separate hub.
- Offers fingerprint, app, voice, keypad, and key entry.
- IP65 water resistance is suited to exterior-door use.
- Adjustable auto-lock timer and AES-128 encrypted local storage add useful access controls.
Cons:- Requires eight AA batteries, which are not included.
- Initial setup may be confusing for less technical hosts.
- Requires 75 mm minimum between handle center and lock center, so door fit needs checking.
Best for: Hosts with exposed exterior doors who want hub-free remote management, multiple entry methods, and a stated water-resistance rating.
Not ideal for: Hosts who want the simplest setup or do not want to supply eight AA batteries and verify the specified door spacing.
- Connectivity:Direct 2.4 GHz WiFi; no hub required
- Battery type:Eight AA batteries, not included
- Auto-lock timer:Adjustable from 0–180 seconds via app
- Fingerprint capacity and speed:20 fingerprints; 0.2-second unlock time
- Encryption:AES-128 local storage
- Water resistance:IP65
- Door thickness compatibility:35–50 mm (1⅜–2 inches)
- Handle-to-lock spacing:Minimum 75 mm (2 15/16 inches) between centers
Our verdict“I’d choose the Veise over the Philips when exterior exposure and a stated IP65 rating matter more than easier setup.”
Fingerprint Smart Deadbolt with Keypad
This deadbolt makes the most sense for hosts managing many guests or household members, thanks to capacity for more than 100 fingerprints and codes. That gives it a different advantage from the myQ Secure View, which supports up to 16 PINs but adds video and doorbell functions. Here, the focus is access flexibility: guests can use fingerprint, keypad, app, fob, or a physical key, while privacy and passage modes suit different moments at the property. For remote code management and Alexa or Google voice control, though, I’d need the separately sold Sifely Gateway. That extra dependency makes this less straightforward than the gateway-free Philips and Veise locks. The listed installation guidance also lacks specific door measurements, so I’d verify fit before choosing it for a rental with an unusual door.
Pros:- Stores more than 100 fingerprints and more than 100 codes.
- Provides five entry methods: fingerprint, keypad code, app, fob, and physical key.
- Includes auto-lock, privacy mode, and passage mode.
- Supports left- or right-handed doors and screwdriver-based DIY installation.
Cons:- Remote access, app-based code management, and voice control require a separately sold Sifely Gateway.
- Product details do not provide specific door measurements for checking fit.
- Unlike the myQ Secure View, it has no integrated camera or doorbell.
Best for: Hosts who need to manage many guest or staff credentials and are willing to add the Sifely Gateway for remote code control.
Not ideal for: Hosts seeking remote access out of the box, or those whose door dimensions need clearly specified compatibility measurements.
- Unlock methods:Fingerprint, keypad code, app, fob, and physical key
- Fingerprint capacity:More than 100
- Code capacity:More than 100
- Door handing:Left- and right-handed doors
- Auto-lock:Yes
- Modes:Privacy mode and passage mode
- Remote access and voice control:Requires separately sold Sifely Gateway
- Installation:DIY with a screwdriver
Our verdict“I’d pick this deadbolt for a credential-heavy rental only if I’m prepared to buy the gateway and confirm door fit.”
myQ Secure View 3-in-1 Smart Lock with Extra Battery
This myQ bundles the lock, doorbell, and 2K HDR security camera with an extra battery, making it a better fit than the other myQ package for hosts who want a backup on hand for a busy turnover schedule. It shares the core conveniences of the myQ Secure View with 2K HDR Video Doorbell Camera: five entry methods, two-way audio, color night vision, motion alerts, and remote monitoring through the app. That makes it a more useful doorstep-monitoring choice than the Veise VE027-L, which concentrates on lock access and weather resistance rather than video. The tradeoffs are similar: remote control relies on the myQ app, and face and fingerprint access have geographic limits, including Illinois, Texas, and locations outside the U.S. and Canada. I’d confirm those restrictions before building guest instructions around biometric entry.
Pros:- Combines a smart deadbolt, video doorbell, and 2K HDR camera.
- Includes an extra battery for backup readiness.
- Offers face, fingerprint, PIN, app, and key entry, plus two-way audio and color night vision.
- Supports motion alerts and automatic locking through the myQ system.
Cons:- Face and fingerprint access are unavailable in Illinois, Texas, and outside the U.S. and Canada.
- Remote control and monitoring require the myQ app.
- Provides capacity for up to 16 PIN codes, fewer than the Fingerprint Smart Deadbolt’s more than 100 codes.
Best for: Hosts who want an integrated lock and camera and value having an extra battery available for ongoing rental use.
Not ideal for: Hosts outside the stated face and fingerprint access regions, or anyone who prefers a lock that does not depend on the myQ app for remote monitoring.
- Product type:Smart deadbolt, video doorbell, and security camera
- Camera resolution:2K HDR
- Entry methods:Face recognition, fingerprint, PIN, app control, and key
- PIN capacity:Up to 16 PIN codes
- Features:Color night vision, two-way audio, motion alerts, and auto-lock
- Door compatibility:Most standard doors
- Access restrictions:Face and fingerprint recognition unavailable in Illinois, Texas, and outside the U.S. and Canada
- App control:Remote control and monitoring through the myQ app
Our verdict“I’d choose this myQ package when integrated video and an extra battery matter more than broad biometric availability or large code capacity.”
Veise VE017-L Fingerprint Smart Lock with 2 Lever Handle Set, Matte Black
The Veise VE017-L suits hosts who want several ways to let guests in without making remote access the main feature. Its 0.2-second fingerprint recognition, PINs, app access, and key fobs give returning guests options, while the included lever handles create a coordinated set. Compared with the Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt, Veise offers key fob access and a stated battery life of up to 12 months, but Philips provides built-in Wi-Fi for remote management without an added gateway. The VE017-L’s DIY installation is designed to take about 10 minutes, and its emergency USB-C charging port is useful if the batteries run low. The tradeoff for Airbnb hosts is that Alexa and Google Assistant integration requires a separately sold gateway, and the batteries are not included.
Pros:- Fast fingerprint recognition gives guests a convenient alternative to remembering a PIN.
- Includes app, fingerprint, code, and key fob access methods.
- Tool-free installation is designed to take about 10 minutes.
- Up to 12 months of battery life, low-battery alerts, and emergency USB-C charging support rental turnover.
Cons:- Alexa and Google Assistant integration requires a separately sold gateway.
- Four AA batteries are not included.
- Remote access depends on the app and gateway setup rather than built-in Wi-Fi.
Best for: Hosts who want a handle-and-lock set with fingerprint, PIN, and key fob access for repeat guests, and who do not need remote control through a smart-home gateway.
Not ideal for: Hosts who need built-in Wi-Fi for remote guest support or want Alexa and Google Assistant integration without buying extra hardware.
- Model:VE017-L
- Finish:Matte black
- Material:Zinc alloy
- Access methods:Fingerprint, app, codes, and key fobs
- Power:4 AA batteries, not included
- Battery life:Up to 12 months
- Door thickness:1-3/8 to 2 inches
- Security:ANSI Grade 3, BHMA; AES-128 encryption
Our verdict“Choose the VE017-L if you want a versatile handle set for guest access and can do without built-in Wi-Fi remote control.”
Aqara UWB Smart Lock U400 with Apple Home Key and Fingerprint Deadbolt
The Aqara U400 is the most ecosystem-dependent pick here, but it can make arrivals feel especially seamless for guests with compatible Apple devices. UWB hands-free unlocking lets the lock respond as a guest approaches, while Apple Home Key, fingerprint, passcode, NFC, app, voice, and physical-key access provide alternatives. Compared with the Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt, the U400 brings Matter over Thread and UWB rather than straightforward built-in Wi-Fi; that broader smart-home approach may suit a connected property, but it calls for compatible Thread-enabled controllers. BHMA certification and an IP65 rating support use at an exposed entry, and USB-C charging avoids disposable batteries. The main Airbnb tradeoff is compatibility: UWB and Home Key depend on newer Apple devices, while its rechargeable battery is rated for up to six months.
Pros:- UWB offers hands-free unlocking for guests with compatible newer Apple devices.
- Apple Home Key, fingerprint, passcode, NFC, app, voice, and physical-key access provide alternatives.
- BHMA certification and IP65 weather resistance suit an outdoor entry.
- Rechargeable battery uses USB-C rather than disposable batteries.
Cons:- UWB and Apple Home Key require compatible newer Apple devices.
- Matter over Thread features require a Thread-enabled controller for each ecosystem used.
- Battery life is up to six months, and NFC cards are sold separately.
Best for: Hosts with an Apple-focused rental and a Thread-enabled Matter setup who want hands-free entry alongside fingerprint and passcode access.
Not ideal for: Hosts seeking a simple, ecosystem-neutral installation or guests who mainly rely on older phones and conventional keypad entry.
- Model:U400
- Finish:Black
- Access methods:UWB, Apple Home Key, fingerprint, touchscreen passcode, voice, app, NFC, and physical key
- Connectivity:Matter over Thread
- Battery life:Up to six months
- Charging:USB-C
- Certification:BHMA certified
- Compatibility:Apple Home, Aqara App, and Matter-supported platforms
Our verdict“Pick the U400 for an Apple-centered rental with the required Thread setup, not for a low-complexity guest lock.”
Philips Smart Deadbolt Lock Set with Keypad and Two Lever Handles
The Philips Smart Deadbolt Lock Set is a practical fit for hosts who issue access to many guests or cleaners: it supports up to 100 user PINs, one-time PINs, and 50 fingerprints. That makes it more suited to managing a steady roster of visitors than a basic fingerprint-first option such as the Veise VE017-L, though the Veise includes key fob access and offers a stated battery-life figure. Philips bundles two lever handles with the deadbolt, giving hosts a matching hardware set and a straightforward screwdriver installation. Bluetooth access works within a stated range of 8–10 meters, while remote control and voice features require a separately sold Wi-Fi bridge. Auto-lock is available, but it has no door-closed sensor, so it may lock while the door is not properly shut.
Pros:- Supports up to 100 user PINs and one-time PINs for managing guest access.
- Stores up to 50 fingerprints for repeat guests or staff.
- Includes two lever handles with the deadbolt.
- Offers fingerprint, PIN, key, app, and Bluetooth unlocking.
Cons:- Remote access and voice control require a separately sold Philips Wi-Fi gateway.
- Auto-lock has no door-closed sensor.
- Bluetooth range is limited to 8–10 meters.
Best for: Hosts who rotate access among many guests and staff and want a deadbolt with generous PIN capacity and matching lever handles.
Not ideal for: Hosts who need remote locking and guest support out of the box, or who want auto-lock to verify the door is fully closed.
- Included hardware:Deadbolt lock and two lever handles
- Access methods:Fingerprint, PIN, key, app, and Bluetooth
- Fingerprint capacity:Up to 50 fingerprints
- User PIN capacity:Up to 100 user PINs
- Bluetooth range:8–10 meters
- Door thickness:1-3/8 to 1-3/4 inches
- Auto-lock:Yes; door must be fully closed
- Remote access:Requires a separately sold Philips Wi-Fi gateway
- Voice compatibility:Amazon Alexa and Google Assistant with separately sold Philips Wi-Fi bridge
Our verdict“Choose this set if managing many PINs and getting matching handles matter more than included remote access.”
Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt Lock with Fingerprint and Keyless Entry
For hosts who need to handle lock issues between turnovers, this Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt puts remote management ahead of elaborate smart-home standards. Its built-in 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi allows remote access without a separate hub, and the app supports activity history, alerts, and scheduled or one-time codes. Compared with the Philips Smart Deadbolt Lock Set with Keypad and Two Lever Handles, this model is the more direct choice for remote control because it does not require a Wi-Fi bridge; the handle-set model, by contrast, specifies capacity for up to 100 user PINs and includes two handles. This lock also has fingerprint and physical-key entry, plus adjustable auto-lock and Away Mode. Its drawbacks are a 2.4 GHz-only connection, no included door sensor, and batteries that hosts must supply.
Pros:- Built-in 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi enables remote access without a separate hub.
- App offers activity alerts, access history, and scheduled codes.
- Supports up to 100 custom passcodes, including shareable one-time or scheduled codes.
- Fingerprint and physical-key entry provide alternatives to app and passcode access.
Cons:- Only supports 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi.
- Batteries are not included.
- No door sensor is included to confirm the door has closed.
Best for: Hosts who want to issue scheduled guest codes and check lock activity remotely without adding a separate Wi-Fi hub.
Not ideal for: Hosts whose network relies on 5 GHz Wi-Fi, or who need a door sensor to confirm the entry has closed before relying on auto-lock.
- Access methods:App, passcode, fingerprint, physical key, Alexa, and Google Assistant
- Connectivity:Built-in 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi; no hub required
- Maximum passcodes:100 custom passcodes
- Auto-lock delay:10–180 seconds
- Door thickness:1-3/8 to 2 inches (38–50 mm)
- Power:AA alkaline batteries, not included
- Door sensor:Not included
- App features:Activity alerts, access history, and scheduled codes
Our verdict“Pick this Philips model if remote code management without a separate hub matters more than door-state sensing.”
Ulecoce U68W WiFi Fingerprint Smart Door Lock with Knob Set, Matte Black
The Ulecoce U68W is a useful fit for hosts who want Wi-Fi access and adjustable relocking without building around a separate hub. Its remote e-key sharing, fingerprint, passcode, app, and backup-key options let hosts tailor access for guests and household members; the 5–60-second auto-lock timer also gives more adjustment than the Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt, whose timer starts at 10 seconds. Ulecoce’s zinc-alloy construction and IP54 rating suit a range of entry conditions, and its stated battery life exceeds six months. The tradeoff is that Wi-Fi-dependent remote features can be affected by connectivity, and setup may take more effort for hosts unfamiliar with lock installation. Batteries are not included, so the lock is not ready to install straight from the box.
Pros:- Remote e-key sharing supports guest access without handing over a physical key.
- Fingerprint, app, passcode, and backup-key access provide multiple entry options.
- Adjustable 5–60-second auto-lock timer gives hosts control over relocking behavior.
- IP54 weather rating, zinc-alloy construction, and a three-year warranty.
Cons:- Four AA batteries are not included.
- Remote features rely on Wi-Fi and may be affected by connectivity problems.
- Initial setup may challenge users unfamiliar with smart-lock installation.
Best for: Hosts who want Wi-Fi-enabled e-key sharing, fingerprint entry, and a short adjustable auto-lock interval for a rental or family property.
Not ideal for: Hosts who prefer the simplest setup, need stable remote access where Wi-Fi is unreliable, or expect batteries to be included.
- Model:Ming-U68W-Black
- Finish:Matte black
- Material:Zinc alloy
- Connectivity:Wi-Fi
- Access methods:App, fingerprint, passcode, remote key, and backup keys
- Power:4 AA batteries, not included
- Battery life:Over six months
- Auto-lock timer:Adjustable from 5 to 60 seconds
Our verdict“Choose the U68W if adjustable auto-lock and remote e-key sharing fit your hosting routine and your entry has dependable Wi-Fi.”
Wyze Lock Bolt v2 Fingerprint Smart Lock with Wi-Fi
For hosts who want guests to get inside quickly without juggling a key or memorizing a code, the Wyze Lock Bolt v2 makes fingerprint entry its main advantage. Its self-learning scanner is described as unlocking in about half a second, while built-in Wi-Fi lets a host manage the lock remotely. Up to 50 fingerprints and 50 keypad codes give repeat guests or cleaners separate entry options. Compared with the eufy Security Smart Lock C220, it offers similar app, keypad, and fingerprint flexibility, but Wyze’s listing specifically calls out tamper alarms and USB-C emergency power. The tradeoff is power upkeep: it takes eight AA batteries, and remote unlocking through a video doorbell depends on a compatible Wyze model. I’d favor it for a rental with frequent arrivals, not for hosts seeking the least battery maintenance.
Pros:- Fast self-learning fingerprint access can simplify arrivals for returning guests.
- Built-in Wi-Fi supports remote lock control without a separate hub.
- Supports up to 50 keypad codes and 50 fingerprints for different users.
- Auto-lock, tamper alarms, physical-key entry, and USB-C emergency power add backup options.
Cons:- Eight AA batteries mean more cells to replace than the four used by the Schlage Encode models.
- Video-doorbell remote unlocking requires a compatible Wyze doorbell.
- The listed battery life is up to eight months, so busy rentals may need more frequent replacement.
Best for: Hosts with repeat guests or cleaning staff who want quick fingerprint entry alongside remotely managed codes.
Not ideal for: Hosts who want to minimize battery changes or need video-doorbell unlocking outside the compatible Wyze ecosystem.
- Model:WLCKB2
- Unlock methods:Fingerprint, app, keypad code, physical key
- Connectivity:Built-in Wi-Fi
- Keypad capacity:Up to 50 codes
- Fingerprint capacity:Up to 50 fingerprints
- Battery life:Up to 8 months
- Batteries:8 AA batteries included
- Weather resistance:IP53
- Emergency power:USB-C
Our verdict“Choose the Wyze Lock Bolt v2 if fast fingerprint entry and flexible guest access matter more than minimizing battery upkeep.”
Schlage Encode Smart WiFi Deadbolt Lock with Camelot Trim, Matte Black
When a rental has a steady stream of guests, 100 access codes give the Schlage Encode room to assign distinct credentials instead of recycling one shared code. I also value its direct Wi-Fi connection for remote locking and monitoring without a separate hub, plus adjustable auto-lock timing that can help secure the door after departures. Compared with the Wyze Lock Bolt v2, this Schlage puts more emphasis on code capacity and voice-assistant support than fingerprint entry. It works with Alexa and Google Assistant, and the built-in alarm adds a response to forced-entry attempts. Its practical limits are the dependence of remote features on stable Wi-Fi and a typical battery life of about six months from four AA batteries. I’d pick it for code-managed turnover, but not if guests expect fingerprint access.
Pros:- Capacity for up to 100 access codes suits frequent guest and staff changes.
- Direct Wi-Fi enables remote locking and monitoring without an external hub.
- Adjustable auto-lock timing can be tailored to the property’s check-out routine.
- Supports Alexa and Google Assistant and includes a forced-entry alarm.
Cons:- Remote functions rely on a stable home Wi-Fi connection.
- Typical battery life is about six months, shorter than the stated up-to-eight-month life of the Wyze Lock Bolt v2.
- No fingerprint unlocking is listed.
Best for: Hosts managing frequent guest changes who want ample individual codes, remote monitoring, and adjustable auto-lock.
Not ideal for: Hosts who want fingerprint entry, or whose rental has unreliable Wi-Fi for remote access.
- Connectivity:Wi-Fi, direct to home network
- Voice control:Amazon Alexa and Google Assistant
- Access-code capacity:Up to 100 codes
- Battery type:4 AA batteries, included
- Battery life:Up to 6 months typical use
- Door thickness:1-3/8 to 1-3/4 inches
- Backset options:2-3/8 or 2-3/4 inches
- Auto-lock:Adjustable delay; can be disabled
Our verdict“Choose this Camelot-trim Schlage if managing many guest codes and remote access matters more than fingerprint convenience.”
Smart Door Handle Lock with Keypad, Yamiry Fingerprint Knob for Front Door
The Yamiry stands out for hosts who want guests to have several ways in: fingerprint, Bluetooth app, passcode, key fob, mechanical key, and Alexa voice control. Its app is described as supporting temporary and one-time codes, which can suit short stays better than relying on a permanent shared credential. Compared with the Schlage Encode Smart WiFi Deadbolt, Yamiry offers fingerprint and key-fob entry, but Schlage connects directly to Wi-Fi and does not require a separately sold gateway for remote control. That distinction matters: Yamiry’s Alexa and remote-lock features need the optional gateway, while the product is limited to standard American wooden doors. The included two key fobs and two mechanical keys provide useful alternatives, but I’d check the door type and gateway needs before choosing it for a managed rental.
Pros:- Six listed entry methods give guests alternatives to keypad codes.
- App features include temporary and one-time access codes.
- Includes two key fobs and two mechanical keys for non-app entry.
- Designed for standard American wooden doors and described as a quick DIY installation.
Cons:- Remote lock control and Alexa require a separately sold Wi-Fi gateway.
- Compatibility is limited to standard American wooden front doors.
- The supplied product data does not state battery life or code capacity.
Best for: Property managers with standard American wooden doors who want several guest entry choices and temporary-code management.
Not ideal for: Hosts who need remote control or Alexa without buying a separate Wi-Fi gateway, or whose doors fall outside the stated compatibility.
- Model:YR01
- Unlock methods:Fingerprint, Bluetooth app, keypad passcode, key fob, mechanical key, Alexa voice
- Remote and Alexa requirement:Separate Wi-Fi gateway
- Access management:Permanent, temporary, and one-time codes via app
- Included key fobs:2
- Included mechanical keys:2
- Door compatibility:Standard American wooden front doors
- Included components:Exterior assembly, interior assembly, key fobs, mechanical keys, screw set, adjustable latch
Our verdict“Choose Yamiry for varied entry methods and temporary access management if your door fits and you are willing to add its Wi-Fi gateway for remote features.”
eufy Security Smart Lock C220 – Fingerprint Keyless Entry Door Lock
The C220 is a strong fit for hosts who want multiple entry choices without adding a separate Wi-Fi bridge. Its built-in Wi-Fi supports remote access, while fingerprint, keypad, app, physical key, Apple Watch, and voice-assistant options let guests use the method that suits them. Compared with the Wyze Lock Bolt v2, the eufy adds Apple Watch entry and lists a broad operating-temperature range; both offer fingerprint access, built-in Wi-Fi, and an eight-AA power setup. Eufy also specifies BHMA Grade 3 certification, a useful durability reference, though it is below Grades 1 and 2. The stated battery life is about eight months, but actual upkeep can vary with use. This is a versatile choice for hosts who value entry flexibility, not those prioritizing a higher listed security grade.
Pros:- Six entry methods give guests several alternatives to a keypad code.
- Built-in Wi-Fi enables remote access without a separate bridge.
- Apple Watch entry adds an option not listed for the Wyze Lock Bolt v2.
- BHMA Grade 3 certification and a stated operating range from -22°F to 158°F provide useful product details.
Cons:- BHMA Grade 3 is below Grade 1 or Grade 2 certification.
- Eight AA batteries may need replacement more often with heavy rental use.
- Approximate eight-month battery life is not a guarantee for high-traffic properties.
Best for: Hosts who want remote access and a broad mix of guest entry methods, including Apple Watch and fingerprint.
Not ideal for: Hosts seeking a Grade 1 or Grade 2 certified lock, or who want to avoid managing eight AA batteries.
- Model:T8506
- Unlock methods:Fingerprint, app, keypad, physical key, Apple Watch, voice assistant
- Connectivity:Built-in Wi-Fi
- Battery life:Approximately 8 months
- Batteries:8 AA batteries
- Certification:BHMA Grade 3
- Operating temperature:-22°F to 158°F (-30°C to 70°C)
- Included keys:2 physical keys
Our verdict“Choose the eufy C220 if you want broad keyless entry options and built-in remote access, and Grade 3 certification meets your needs.”
Schlage Encode Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt with Century Trim, Matte Black
For hosts who want to check activity between stays, this Century-trim Encode combines remote control, lock history, and customizable notifications in one Wi-Fi deadbolt. Its capacity for up to 100 access codes also makes it easier to separate guest credentials from staff access. Compared with the Schlage Encode with Camelot Trim, the core access approach is similar: both list direct Wi-Fi, Alexa and Google Home compatibility, a built-in alarm, and four AA batteries with up to six months of typical life. This Century version specifically lists lock history and customizable notifications, which can help a host follow activity remotely. The tradeoffs are shared too: remote and voice functions depend on Wi-Fi and compatible apps or devices, and no fingerprint entry is listed. I’d choose it for monitoring, not biometric convenience.
Pros:- Lock history and customizable notifications support remote oversight between stays.
- Up to 100 access codes can separate guest and staff access.
- Built-in Wi-Fi provides remote control without an additional hub.
- Includes auto-lock, a built-in alarm, and Alexa and Google Home compatibility.
Cons:- Remote and voice features depend on Wi-Fi and compatible apps or devices.
- Battery life is up to six months with typical use.
- No fingerprint entry is listed, unlike the Wyze Lock Bolt v2 and eufy C220.
Best for: Hosts who want remote lock status, activity history, notifications, and separate codes for guests and staff.
Not ideal for: Hosts who prefer fingerprint entry or need reliable remote controls at a property with unstable Wi-Fi.
- Connectivity:Built-in Wi-Fi
- Access-code capacity:Up to 100 codes
- Voice assistants:Amazon Alexa and Google Home
- Monitoring features:Lock history and customizable notifications
- Door thickness:1-3/8 to 1-3/4 inches
- Backset:2-3/8 or 2-3/4 inches
- Power:4 AA batteries
- Battery life:Up to 6 months with typical use
- Trim and finish:Century trim, matte black
Our verdict“Choose the Century-trim Encode if remote activity history and notifications matter more than fingerprint access or longer battery intervals.”
How We Picked
I ranked these locks around the recurring demands of short-term rentals: issuing access without handing over a physical key, changing codes between stays, supporting remote management where available, and keeping entry dependable when a guest arrives late. I gave more weight to clear keypad-based access and built-in connectivity than to features that mainly benefit the owner, such as fingerprint entry or video. I also treated the lock’s form factor as a practical issue: replacing a deadbolt is different from replacing a complete handle set or a knob.
The order reflects the balance of hosting utility, access flexibility, installation fit, and ongoing maintenance—not a claim that one lock suits every property. Models with remote connectivity and a straightforward path to guest access rank ahead of options whose strengths depend on a compatible smart-home setup or owner biometrics. Camera features, extra batteries, handle configurations, and trim choices can be worthwhile, but they do not automatically make a lock better for every rental. Since exact app functions, compatibility, and included hardware can vary by model or package, I treat those as points for buyers to verify before purchase.
Factors to Consider When Choosing Smart Lock For Airbnb Hosts
Choosing a rental lock is less about collecting the most features and more about matching access to your property, turnover routine, and backup plan. I’d settle the door-fit and guest-access questions before comparing fingerprint sensors or camera specifications.
Start With the Door, Not the Feature List
Check whether your door currently has a deadbolt, a combined handle-and-deadbolt set, or a knob lock before choosing a replacement. A deadbolt-only model may leave the existing handle in place, while a full handle set changes more hardware and may require additional measurements. Record door thickness, backset, hole dimensions, handing, and the space around the interior trim, then compare those measurements with the installation requirements. A lock that does not fit can turn a simple swap into drilling, extra parts, or a return. For a rental, I’d favor a compatible installation that preserves a sturdy mechanical fallback over a feature-rich lock that needs door alterations you cannot easily reverse.
Plan Guest Access Around Turnover
Ask how codes are created, shared, changed, and removed before relying on a lock for reservations. A keypad can be convenient, but the host workflow matters: manually updating codes after every stay creates room for mistakes, while integrations and scheduling features depend on the exact lock, app, and booking setup. Do not assume that a product labeled smart automatically creates reservation-specific codes or connects directly to a rental platform. If you manage several properties or frequent same-day turnovers, test the code process and notifications before installing the lock at every door. For a single listing with fewer changes, a simple app-managed code routine may be enough.
Decide How Much Remote Access You Actually Need
Built-in Wi-Fi can let a host manage a lock away from the property, but remote features rely on a working internet connection, app access, and suitable Wi-Fi coverage near the door. Some smart locks use a separate hub or bridge for remote control, so confirm what is included and what must be purchased separately. If you only need to set codes while on site, Bluetooth or keypad operation may cover the basics with fewer network dependencies. For a rental where you cannot reach the door quickly, remote status and code control can be worth prioritizing. Keep a physical key or another tested entry method available for network outages and app problems.
Treat Power and Backup Entry as Part of the Setup
Battery life depends on usage, connectivity, weather exposure, and the lock’s features, so a busy rental may need more frequent checks than a lightly used home. Pick a battery type you can keep on hand and set a repeating maintenance reminder instead of waiting for a low-power alert. A camera, Wi-Fi connection, or motorized mechanism can add useful capability while also adding power demands or charging tasks. Before a guest arrives, confirm that the keypad works and that your backup key or emergency power method is accessible to someone who can respond. A lock without a practiced backup plan can turn a minor battery issue into a missed check-in.
Balance Guest Convenience With Privacy
Fingerprint access can make entry quick for an owner or repeat visitor, but a rotating guest group may find a one-time code easier than registering biometrics. A video doorbell can help a host see activity at the entrance, yet cameras introduce privacy, disclosure, placement, and local-rule concerns that a keypad alone does not. Check the camera’s field of view and recording controls, and follow the rules that apply to your rental and booking platform. Avoid placing cameras where guests expect privacy, and state clearly what monitoring is present. If video does not solve a real management problem, a simpler lock may be easier to maintain and explain.
Pay for Features That Reduce Your Work
A higher-feature lock makes sense when it removes a recurring task, such as traveling to hand over keys or coordinating a remote check-in. Extra batteries, fingerprint entry, a camera, or a complete handle set can add value when those features solve a specific property need. They may add little for a host who already has reliable local support and only needs a keypad. Compare total setup demands, including hubs, app accounts, batteries, and door modifications, rather than focusing on the feature list alone. I’d spend more for dependable remote access when I manage the listing from a distance, but choose a simpler model when the added functions would rarely be used.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I give each Airbnb guest a different door code?
Many keypad smart locks let hosts create multiple codes, but the number of codes, scheduling options, and remote controls vary by model and app. Check whether codes can be set for specific dates or whether you must create and delete them manually. Do not assume that a lock automatically syncs with a booking calendar; confirm any platform integration directly. If you manage frequent turnovers, test the complete code workflow before relying on it for a live reservation. Keep a separate, secure owner code and remove guest access when a stay ends.
Will a smart lock still work if the Wi-Fi goes down?
Many locks retain local keypad or physical-key access during an internet outage, but remote commands and status updates may stop until the connection returns. The exact behavior depends on the lock and how it connects, so check the manufacturer’s instructions rather than treating Wi-Fi and entry as the same function. A guest may still be able to enter with a previously saved code even when you cannot change it remotely. Keep a tested mechanical key or another local backup and make sure a nearby contact can help if needed. Wi-Fi should add convenience, not serve as the only path through the door.
Should I choose a fingerprint lock or a keypad lock for a rental?
For changing groups of guests, a keypad is often easier to explain because visitors can use a code without registering a biometric. Fingerprint access can be useful for the owner, cleaner, or repeat staff, but it may require enrollment and can be less convenient for a short stay. Some locks combine both methods, though each extra access method adds setup and maintenance decisions. Consider whether your guests will arrive late, have limited phone access, or need a very simple check-in process. I’d prioritize a clear code workflow and treat fingerprint entry as a bonus unless your property has regular users.
Is a smart deadbolt enough, or should I replace the handle too?
A deadbolt-only replacement is often the simpler route when the existing handle is sound and compatible with the door. A handle-set model can provide a coordinated appearance or replace worn hardware, but it involves more measurements and may take longer to install. A smart knob should not be assumed to offer the same security function as a separate deadbolt. Check the current door layout, dimensions, and installation instructions before deciding which parts need replacement. If the existing handle works well, replacing only the deadbolt can keep the project more straightforward.
Is a smart lock with a video doorbell worth the added complexity for an Airbnb?
A combined lock and video doorbell can help a host manage arrival questions and view activity at an exterior entrance, especially when no local contact is available. It also adds charging or battery maintenance, app setup, network demands, and camera privacy obligations. Before choosing one, confirm what the camera records, how footage is stored, and what disclosures or restrictions apply to your rental. If you mainly need secure self-check-in, a keypad lock may solve the problem with less upkeep. The camera option makes more sense when remote visibility addresses a frequent, clearly defined hosting need.
Conclusion
For most hosts who want remote code management without a separate hub, I’d choose the Schlage Encode Smart WiFi Deadbolt as the best overall starting point; compare the Camelot and Century trim versions against your door and preferred appearance. For a value-minded setup, the Fingerprint Smart Deadbolt with Keypad is a straightforward feature combination to compare, though I’d verify its app, connectivity, and code-management details before buying. The myQ Secure View 3-in-1 is my premium pick for hosts who have a real use for a camera as well as a lock, while the Philips WiFi Smart Lock with Handle Set is a practical beginner option for someone replacing both the lock and handle in one project. For owners who want biometric entry, I’d look at the eufy Security Smart Lock C220; for a door that needs a complete handle set or a particular trim, compare the Veise and Philips handle-set models. Whichever you choose, confirm fit, guest-code procedures, power upkeep, and backup entry before putting it into service.
